This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [RFA] fix compilation warning in libiberty.h
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Adam Nemet <anemet at lnxw dot com>
- Cc: Jerome Guitton <guitton at adacore dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:44:21 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFA] fix compilation warning in libiberty.h
- References: <20050331132734.GA25521@adacore.com> <20050331144312.GA2694@nevyn.them.org> <17001.33583.831885.170218@anemet1.lynx.com>
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 04:05:19PM -0700, Adam Nemet wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 03:27:34PM +0200, Jerome Guitton wrote:
> >> +AC_MSG_CHECKING(for a declaration for basename)
> >> +AC_CACHE_VAL(bfd_cv_decl_basename,
> >> +[AC_TRY_COMPILE([#include "sysdep.h"],
> >> +[#ifndef basename
> >
> > Can't this be just AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename)?
>
> The checked in version was:
>
> AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename, , , [#include "sysdep.h"])
>
> How is this supposed to find sysdep.h? I am getting:
>
> $ grep -C basename bfd/config.log
> configure:9522: $? = 0
> configure:9534: result: yes
> configure:9545: checking whether basename is declared
> configure:9570: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5
> conftest.c:73:20: sysdep.h: No such file or directory
This should be fixed as of Wednesday; do you still see the problem?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC