This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Binutils builds broken with -Werror

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
Cc: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: 22 Mar 2005 11:55:14 -0500
Subject: Re: Binutils builds broken with -Werror
References: <20050316201339.GA17575@nevyn.them.org><423E89B0.6000901@redhat.com><wvnu0n56z8a.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com><42404C18.5000007@redhat.com>

Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> writes:

> Poo.  Well we can rely upon using a GNU-like make program, right ?  So
> how about this version then ?

That's an interesting question.  gcc has decided to require GNU make.
Do the binutils want to follow?

I have no strong opinion on the matter.  GNU make Makefiles can get
pretty horrible pretty fast, but that should be controllable in
principle.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Binutils builds broken with -Werror
  - From: Nick Clifton

References:
- Binutils builds broken with -Werror
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Binutils builds broken with -Werror
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: Binutils builds broken with -Werror
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: Binutils builds broken with -Werror
  - From: Nick Clifton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]