This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Suprpess unexpected failure in gas testsuite for tic4x-coff
- From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:36:42 +0000
- Subject: Suprpess unexpected failure in gas testsuite for tic4x-coff
Hi Guys,
The tic4x-coff port is failing the gas/macro/and.s test because it
uses the '&' character as a line separator which prevents it being
used as an operator inside a .if statement. Hence I am adding an
xfail for the this test for this port.
Cheers
Nick
gas/testsuite/ChangeLog
2005-03-03 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
* gas/macros/macros.exp (and.s): Expect this test to fail for the
tic4x-coff target because it uses the '&' character as a line
separator.
Index: gas/testsuite/gas/macros/macros.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/macros.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -c -3 -p -r1.20 macros.exp
*** gas/testsuite/gas/macros/macros.exp 3 Mar 2005 15:13:39 -0000 1.20
--- gas/testsuite/gas/macros/macros.exp 3 Mar 2005 17:15:28 -0000
*************** if { ![istarget *c54x*-*-*] && ![istarge
*** 32,37 ****
--- 32,42 ----
gas_test_error "err.s" "" "macro infinite recursion"
+ # The tic4x-coff target fails the next test because it defines '&'
+ # as its line separator character, so the expression "(0 & TFLAG_C)"
+ # becomes divided up into two lines and the parser complains about
+ # a missing closing parenthesis for the first line.
+ setup_xfail "tic4x*-*"
gas_test "and.s" "" "" "logical and in macro definition"
case $target_triplet in {