This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Q: Estimated date for 2.16 release ?
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg at 66h dot 42h dot de>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:32:11 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: Q: Estimated date for 2.16 release ?
- References: <OF61577335.B313AA4D-ONC2256F96.004AE546-C2256F96.004B5A37@nsc.com><20050127140010.GA447@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.BSO.4.61L.0501271842380.2842@odem.66h.42h.de><20050224172738.GA5216@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz dixit:
>Yes, that's the right way to do it. I don't much intend to see these
>in 2.16, though.
Sure, I'm going with CVS snapshots at the moment anyway (until we are
_really_ near a release ourselfes) and I don't want to have impact on
the other OSes.
Since one of the patches (elf32.em) is quite a complicated one, I
figured that after releasing (or rather branching) 2.16 would be the
best point to feed it back so it gets tested the most.
bye,
//mirabile
--
> [...] Echtzeit hat weniger mit "Speed"[...] zu tun, sondern damit, daß der
> richtige Prozeß voraussagbar rechtzeitig sein Zeitscheibchen bekommt.
Wir haben uns[...] geeinigt, dass das verwendete Echtzeit-Betriebssystem[...]
weil selbst einfachste Operationen *echt* *Zeit* brauchen. (aus d.a.s.r)