This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Use $(SHELL) when running move-if-change

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: ian at airs dot com
Cc: bje at au dot ibm dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:05:31 -0500
Subject: Re: Use $(SHELL) when running move-if-change
References: <20041220212226.32268.qmail@gossamer.airs.com><87zn08edhb.fsf@au.ibm.com> <m3zn088jpi.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

> Personally I would just as soon keep the top level files in synch
> with gcc as much as possible.  So, how about if it is accepted for
> gcc, it's OK for binutils?

GCC is in regressions-only mode, so I suspect cosmetic changes like
this would be discouraged until after they branch.

References:
- Use $(SHELL) when running move-if-change
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Use $(SHELL) when running move-if-change
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: Use $(SHELL) when running move-if-change
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]