This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
PR/338 (assertion in bfd_link_add_undef in linker.c)
- From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich at novell dot com>
- To: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:42:58 +0100
- Subject: PR/338 (assertion in bfd_link_add_undef in linker.c)
Isn't the change implemented to fix this problem insufficient in that it
does not cover the case where the symbol is already on the undefined
chain, but also is the last one there?