This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: gcc and -fPIC


> -----Original Message-----
> From: binutils-owner On Behalf Of bserdar
> Sent: 15 October 2004 19:27

> >  80485b3:       e8 00 00 00 00          call   80485b8 <X::f()+0xc>
> >  80485b8:       5b                      pop    %ebx
> >  80485b9:       81 c3 5c 12 00 00       add    $0x125c,%ebx
> 
> With pop ebx, it pops the eip at that instruction to ebx. I'm 
> guessing it'll use ebx as a base pointer to data (or code?) 
> from this point on. You can verify this guess by accessing 
> some global variables from within X::f() and see whether it 
> uses ebx-relative access.
> 

  Oh blimey, I didn't spot that.  Yes, of course that's what it's doing.
Please ignore my previous post, I would now assume that the -r flag will in
fact show that no reloc is applied nor needed on that instruction.

    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]