This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: as.info built in the source directory?

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: bje at au1 dot ibm dot com
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:45:31 -0400
Subject: Re: as.info built in the source directory?
References: <87vfgswtxm.fsf@au.ibm.com><200407130217.i6D2HVek031609@greed.delorie.com> <871xjgk1n9.fsf@au.ibm.com>

> They don't need to be built into the srcdir in order for them to be
> included in the source distribution.  The source tree and the
> distribution are distinct.

I don't think the FSF cares how we get the files into a source
distribution, as long as they're there.  A consistent workable
solution would be nice ;-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: as.info built in the source directory?
  - From: Ben Elliston

References:
- as.info built in the source directory?
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: as.info built in the source directory?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: as.info built in the source directory?
  - From: Ben Elliston

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]