This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> > I'm not sure why you think moving to one copy of the FSF dejagnu > > sources will disturb that. > > I was concerned about the toplevel build support, not the dejagnu > sources. The toplevel makefile/configure can deal with dejagnu being > there or not, I see no need to remove such support. The obvious reason to remove such support is to reduce the amount of stuff to maintain. If having top-level build support for expect and dejagnu is important to Red Hat, can't Red Hat maintain local patches? Ben
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |