This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Add access restriction check for application registers(was Re: Is this a gas bug?)

From: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Jie Zhang <jiez at citiz dot net>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>,george dot gan at intel dot com,"binutils at sources dot redhat dot com" <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: 27 May 2004 21:55:19 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: Add access restriction check for application registers(was Re: Is this a gas bug?)
References: <1085333524.2233.56.camel@mars> <jesmdrow2p.fsf@sykes.suse.de><1085411758.869.20.camel@mars> <20040526182849.GA1631@lucon.org><1085688908.1064.3.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org> <20040528043010.GA2198@lucon.org>

On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 21:30, H. J. Lu wrote:
> 	* config/tc-ia64.c (ar_is_in_integer_unit): Removed.

Or removing it is fine too.

This looks OK to me.
-- 
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com

References:
- RE: Is this a gas bug?
  - From: Jie Zhang
- Re: Is this a gas bug?
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- PATCH: Add access restriction check for application registers (wasRe: Is this a gas bug?)
  - From: Jie Zhang
- Re: PATCH: Add access restriction check for application registers (was Re: Is this a gas bug?)
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Add access restriction check for application registers(was Re: Is this a gas bug?)
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: PATCH: Add access restriction check for application registers (was Re: Is this a gas bug?)
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]