This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: *-rtems and binutils 2.14.92

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: drow at false dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com,joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 14:06:56 +0930
Subject: Re: *-rtems and binutils 2.14.92
References: <40A111FA.2060808@OARcorp.com> <20040511175430.GA20537@nevyn.them.org> <40A12DF9.6010902@OARcorp.com> <20040511195018.GA30634@nevyn.them.org> <40A131B0.1030704@OARcorp.com> <m34qqm7mg4.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 04:12:11PM -0400, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> tricky.  After all, --1 is well defined if '--' is not an operator.
> For gas to start rejecting it is dubious.  On the other hand, for gcc
> to generate it is also dubious.

I think the gas diagnostic for '--' and '++' should be downgraded to
a warning.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

References:
- *-rtems and binutils 2.14.92
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: *-rtems and binutils 2.14.92
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: *-rtems and binutils 2.14.92
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: *-rtems and binutils 2.14.92
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: *-rtems and binutils 2.14.92
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: *-rtems and binutils 2.14.92
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]