Re: [PATCH] Add .secrel32 gas pseudo-op and reloc for ix86 PE

[Brian Ford <ford at vss dot fsi dot com>]

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Nick Clifton wrote:

> Brian Ford wrote:
>
> >2.) I'm trying to decide what version number should go in the
> >gcc_GAS_CHECK_FEATURE macro test for .secrel32 in my gcc patch.  I assume
> >if this is not applied to the branch that it should be 2.16.0, otherwise
> >2.15.0?
>
> No - the mainline is 2.15.90  (For various arcane reasons...)

Yes, I saw that.  But, it did not change after the above was committed, so
it is not sufficient.  I think I need to know the next version number
of gas after my change?

Also, I only see one gcc_GAS_CHECK_FEATURE macro that uses a non-zero
third digit in that version number.  Incidentally, that particular one
uses 2.15.91.  Is that the number I need?

Sorry to be so dense, but I haven't been following the binutils version
numbering scheme.

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot...