This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] Add .secrel32 gas pseudo-op and reloc for ix86 PE
- From: Brian Ford <ford at vss dot fsi dot com>
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 12:16:31 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add .secrel32 gas pseudo-op and reloc for ix86 PE
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0404152103370.19315@thing1-200> <408514D5.30503@redhat.com>
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Brian Ford wrote:
>
> >This patch adds a gas pseudo-op ".secrel32 symbol" to generate a 32-bit
> >section relative address/relocation on ix86 PE targets (Cygwin/Mingw). It
> >is a necessary prerequisite for the forth coming DWARF 2/3 support.
>
> Thanks for submitting this patch. I have approved it and applied it to
> the sources.
Thanks!
A few more questions:
1.) Has anyone had a chance to review this yet?
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00329.html
2.) I'm trying to decide what version number should go in the
gcc_GAS_CHECK_FEATURE macro test for .secrel32 in my gcc patch. I assume
if this is not applied to the branch that it should be 2.16.0, otherwise
2.15.0?
3.) Any chance this stuff could go on the branch? I would minimally need:
Approved for HEAD:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00327.html
I guess this one might be risky?
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00247.html
Not yet approved:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00329.html
It would also be nice to have:
Approved for HEAD:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-03/msg00543.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-03/msg00541.html
If any are approved, I'd be happy to merge them onto the branch and
check them in. Thanks again.
--
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax: 314-551-8444