This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Makefile mess in gas
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:12:38 -0500
- Subject: Re: Makefile mess in gas
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403032141090.322@pervalidus.dyndns.org> <20040304013418.GA11361@lucon.org> <20040304165300.GA25500@lucon.org>
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 08:53:00AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> Makefile is a mess in gas. There are 2 problems:
>
> 1. Makefile.am and doc/Makefile.am were changed. But Makefile.in and
> doc/Makefile.in were never updated. Only the part of
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-12/msg00364.html
>
> was applied. None of the generated files were checked in.
>
> 2. "make install" doesn't install as.1.
>
> It is not hard to fix #1. But #2 seems to be done on purpose, according
> to
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-12/msg00364.html
>
> Could someone please take a look at them?
The way I read Maciej's email, his patch was supposed to fix it - the
way we were previously installing info pages was supressing installing
man pages. Do you still see the problem with regenerated
Makefile.in's?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer