This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: New target porting time estimates?
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Richard Tierney <mfoc73 at dsl dot pipex dot com>
- Cc: gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:50:15 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: New target porting time estimates?
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Richard Tierney wrote:
> I think I'll estimate 9 months, followed by a lifetime of
> maintenance. The only other estimate I found on the web was Tim Olson's
> statement that "A simple basic port (without working out all the subtle
> bugs) can be done in a man-month or so." H-PN doesn't seem to give any
> estimates - he still seems to be working on it.. :)
Only as much as _all_ ports are still being worked on, except
those deprecated and thrown out. It's called maintenance, but I
see you already plan for it so enough said. Or do you refer to
something in particular in the CRIS or MMIX ports? Anyway, I
feel any and all of my conclusions in the "Porting GCC for
Dunces" document should be taken with a truckload of salt.
IIRC Mike Stump once said something like "8 years to learn gcc,
then a few months per port".
brgds, H-P
PS. Don't forget to plan for reading the gcc lists too, now
only a week and a half behind...