This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:10:51AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:40:10PM +0100, Carlo Wood wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:14:59AM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > > But sending bug reports to binutils@sources.redhat.com is just as
> > > good. It's up to you.
> >
> > Ok, thanks.
> >
> > On 17 October I mailed this list about a bug in
> > binutils 2.14.90. I was wondering what has
> > happened with this report. Maybe it was lost,
> > this being just a mailinglist etc.
> >
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-10/msg00456.html
>
> The change is intentional. The testcase looks normal to me since
> the discarded function is identical to the remained. Is there a
> problem with gdb? Please follow
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-06/msg00471.html
>
I took a look at the original bug report:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-10/msg00657.html
The issue here is 2 functions have the same size, but slightly
different. I don't think we can solve all those link-once debug
problems without SHT_GROUP.
H.J.