This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Subscrubing to bug-binutils (was: Re: [ams@kemisten.nu: BFD broken on GNU/Hurd.])

From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:10:21 -0400
Subject: Re: Subscrubing to bug-binutils (was: Re: [ams@kemisten.nu: BFD broken on GNU/Hurd.])
References: <20031012134651.GI18493@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <Pine.BSF.4.44.0310121037330.36988-100000@dair.pair.com> <20031013200142.GA18276@nevyn.them.org>

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 04:01:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 03:59:42PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> Anyone with a clue about subscription for bug-binutils?
>
>It's actually just an alias for bug-gnu-utils, which will be listed.

Aha!  That explains why I couldn't unsubscribe the list archiver on
sources.redhat.com.  Thanks!

I'd be willing to add a spam-filtered gateway on sources.redhat.com but
I've never been able to find a way (not that I've investigated really
really hard) to quiet qmail/ezmlm from chattering back to the
originating list.  That eventually results in the list on
sources.redhat.com being unsubscribed from the gnu.org list.

cgf

References:
- Re: [ams@kemisten.nu: BFD broken on GNU/Hurd.]
  - From: Alan Modra
- Subscrubing to bug-binutils (was: Re: [ams@kemisten.nu: BFD brokenon GNU/Hurd.])
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: Subscrubing to bug-binutils (was: Re: [ams@kemisten.nu: BFD broken on GNU/Hurd.])
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]