This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:42:55AM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > I will throw the new demangler on my gdb test bed and look for regressions. > I'm sure H. J. has the demangler test suite covered and I can do the > gdb test suite. > > I have kind of a silly question. Do I need to rebuild binutils and/or gcc > with the new demangler, or can I just rebuild gdb? That is, do gcc or > binutils ever need to run the demangler while compiling? You only need to rebuild gdb with it unless you need to use c++filt, which is the part of binutils. I am enclosing 2 files. README is used to apply my patch and recreate those generated files. I also included a correct patch for binutils/gdb since now the toplevel directories are different between binutils/gdb and gcc. H.J.
Attachment:
README
Description: Text document
Attachment:
src-demangler-11.patch.gz.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |