This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: powerpc-darwin x hppa1.1-hpux10.20 toolchain
- From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>
- To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
- Cc: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 13:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: powerpc-darwin x hppa1.1-hpux10.20 toolchain
--- Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> wrote:
> Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com> writes:
>
> > --- amodra@bigpond.net.au wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 02:38:54AM -0700, Dara
> > > Hazeghi wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to build a cross-toolchain to
> > > hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20.
> > >
> > > You can't I'm afraid. This target only builds
> on a
> > > native host,
> > > because it uses the native header files.
> >
> > Do you mean binutils or gcc? I thought that even
> > without header files, usually cross-assembler,
> > cross-linker, and cross cc1 can be built, though
> > nothing else. Admittedly I don't think there is a
> > cross linker in this case, but I figured building
> gas
> > would be possible.
>
> In this case he means binutils. For example, see
> bfd/som.c, which
> uses header files only available on an HP host.
>
> Nobody has done the work required to make this port
> host-independent.
Thanks for the clarification. Assuming that I can get
the header files though, this should build? Thanks,
Dara
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com