This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
[howarth@nitro.med.uc.edu: Re: flex 2.5.31 vs binutils]
- From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:02:46 -0700
- Subject: [howarth@nitro.med.uc.edu: Re: flex 2.5.31 vs binutils]
----- Forwarded message from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu> -----
Delivered-To: hjl at localhost dot lucon dot org
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:40:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Subject: Re: flex 2.5.31 vs binutils
HJ,
I tried the 2.13.90.0.20 release using the current debian
patches with the new flex fix and it works fine. The 2.13.90.0.20
binutils builds fine and passes all of make check on debian ppc
sid. The patch that debian is using to deal with the new flex is
as follows...
diff -r -u binutils-2.13.90.0.18.old/ld/ldlex.l binutils-2.13.90.0.18/ld/ldlex.l--- binutils-2.13.90.0.18.old/ld/ldlex.l 2002-11-09 20:08:31.000000000 +0100
+++ binutils-2.13.90.0.18/ld/ldlex.l 2003-04-13 16:25:44.000000000 +0200
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@
int max_size;
{
*result = 0;
- if (yy_current_buffer->yy_input_file)
+ if (YY_CURRENT_BUFFER->yy_input_file)
{
if (yyin)
{
Jack