This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: MIPS patch to avoid lazy binding in la macros
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 09:02:01PM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com> writes:
> > If you do this, you introduce another required version binding between
> > GCC and binutils to create a working MIPS toolchain;
>
> I don't think it's a hard requirement. If you don't patch gcc,
> the worst that's going to happen is that functions in new DSOs
> won't be lazily bound. OK, that might be quite bad in some
> cases, but...
I might be misinterpreting what you said. I got the impression that
your changes affected tests of undefined weak symbols equal to zero -
was I wrong?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer