This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: (toplevel) Fix dramatic breakage for ordinary crosses (related to program_transform_name)
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:00:58PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > I dunno, sounds fine to me if it lets the subsequent real build
> > go in parallel.
> If you fill the job slots with busy-wait configures, there aren't any
> slots left to put real builds in.
> Of course, this is the point where we could conditionally take
> advantage of gmake's "don't run these in parallel" syntax.
Which it doesn't have. I was mistaken about the purpose of the
construct I quoted. Not that we couldn't add such a syntax to GNU
make; it might be generally useful.
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer