Re: [RFA/PATCH] Add Mac OS X support to config.bfd

[Klee Dienes <klee at apple dot com>]

Sure, I don't see why not.  I suppose in theory the powerpc-*-x forms 
are more accurate, though I suspect it's unlikely to be a practical 
issue.  Would you also be using i386-*-darwin/macos10/rhapsody as well?

On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 08:10 PM, Alan Modra wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:42:45AM -0500, Klee Dienes wrote:
> > +  powerpc-apple-rhapsody* | powerpc-apple-macos10* | 
> > powerpc-apple-darwin*)
> > +    targ_defvec=mach_o_be_vec
> > +    targ_selvecs="mach_o_be_vec mach_o_le_vec mach_o_fat_vec pef_vec 
> > pef_xlib_vec sym_vec"
> > +    targ_archs="bfd_powerpc_arch bfd_rs6000_arch bfd_i386_arch"
> > +    ;;
> Can we just use powerpc-*-rhapsody* etc.?  ie. leave out "apple".
> For consistency with gcc's configuration files more than anything else.
>
> --
> Alan Modra
> IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre