This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Bug in >64k-section ELF handling when linking (with -r)
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- To: drow at mvista dot com
- Cc: hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 18:24:23 +0100
- Subject: Re: Bug in >64k-section ELF handling when linking (with -r)
> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 12:15:13 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 04:23:34PM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > From: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
> > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 01:58:18AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > > Would you prefer the tests in
> > > > ld-elf/sec64k.exp? Perhaps best anyway to wait after a fix is
> > > > committed; having test-suite runs hanging is inproductive.
> > > Yes, and yes.
> > Thanks. But mind you, it *does* add 30m-1h(!) YMMV to running
> > the test-suite, making it quite awkward.
> In that case, please don't add the testcase right now, or add it
> disabled. Adding a half hour to my make check runs would be really
> awkward...
Ok. When I add it, I'll enable it for cris-*-* only. It might
even make sense to keep it target-specific, in order to check
that some section numbers matches other ELF fields. Section
numbers vary among targets, because targets have different
"extra" sections.
brgds, H-P