This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Get rid of underscore.c

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, zack at codesourcery dot com,Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, dj at redhat dot com,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:14:01 +0100
Subject: Re: Get rid of underscore.c
References: <m33csfxzd0.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com><20020905012525.GC6886@codesourcery.com><200209121042.g8CAgni00557@pc960.cambridge.arm.com><20020912170531.GB26325@codesourcery.com><m37khrt5gj.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com><wvlit112iv3.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><20020920080008.A29711@lucon.org>

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:00:08 -0700, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:

> How about this? Move cxxfilt.c to libiberty, but never compile it in
> libiberty. Buy default, binutils will compile cxxfilt in its binutils
> directory.

Why?  Why build c++filt in binutils?  Why?

The demanger should be bundled with the mangler, i.e. the compiler.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Get rid of underscore.c
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

References:
- Removal of MAIN code from libiberty/cplus-dem.c
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: Get rid of underscore.c
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: Get rid of underscore.c
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Get rid of underscore.c
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: Get rid of underscore.c
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: Get rid of underscore.c
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]