This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: binutils-2.13.tar.bz2
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Graeme Peterson <gp at qnx dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 12:12:13 -0400
- Subject: Re: binutils-2.13.tar.bz2
- References: <200208081605.QAA114561059@node128.ott.qnx.com>
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 12:05:03PM -0400, Graeme Peterson wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I may have missed the e-mails discussing this, but is
> there a reason why the binutils-2.13 tarball and upgrade
> patch are only posted in bz2 format? I found, built and
> used bzip2, but it seems inconvenient to expect the world
> to have to do that.
>
> $ ftp ftp://ftp.gnu.org
> Connected to ftp.gnu.org.
>
> <snip big blurb>
>
> ftp> cd gnu/binutils
> 250 Directory successfully changed.
> ftp> pwd
> 257 "/gnu/binutils"
> ftp> ls *2.13*
> 200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV.
> 150 Here comes the directory listing.
> -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 2177752 Aug 06 14:40 binutils-2.12.1-2.13-patch.bz2
> -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 9882367 Aug 06 14:40 binutils-2.13.tar.bz2
> 226 Directory send OK.
> ftp>
>
> Thanks.
Because the makefile currently makes bz2 tarballs? :) I'll put up
gzipped versions in a little bit, thanks for the reminder.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer