This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: The new mips gas breaks gcc 2.96
- From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at ds2 dot pg dot gda dot pl>
- Cc: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>,Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts at csv dot ica dot uni-stuttgart dot de>,Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 09:01:57 -0700
- Subject: Re: The new mips gas breaks gcc 2.96
- References: <20020802080652.B2643@lucon.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020805104304.18894Aemail@example.com>
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 10:51:53AM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > How about adding a translation from "-mcpu=x" to "-march=x -mtune=x" to
> > > your gcc's specs? It should be the least maintenance trouble and is
> > > probably the right solution for an obsolete compiler.
> > I can't force it for all the users of my Linux binutils. Besides, until
> > gcc 3.2 is stable enough, I won't obsolete my gcc 2.96.
> You may state an appropriate version of your gcc 2.96 is needed for MIPS
Although I still use gcc 2.96, I have no plan to touch it unless it is
absolutely necessary. Besides, I can't force it.
> starting from version x of your binutils. You may even check it at the
> configure time. It's a reasonable assumption -- you don't force all the
> users of your binutils to upgrade them, either, so they may either stick
I'd like to get my binutils tested as much as posible. The last thing
I want is to hear that the new binutils generates bad binaries 2 years
from now just because he/she couldn't use the new binutils earlier due
to the gcc version issue.
> to versions they have now or upgrade both packages at the same time.
> AFAIK, up to 3.x gcc didn't support MIPS/Linux out of the box anyway, so
> patches for it are needed anyway.
> Anyway, do as you want to, as long as nobody complains here of binutils
> as distributed by FSF not working with gcc 2.96...
I guess they won't complain it to me :-).