This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: copy_private_bfd_data in bfd/elf.c question
- From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Cc: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 21:26:52 +0930
- Subject: Re: copy_private_bfd_data in bfd/elf.c question
- References: <200206211526.IAA18732@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <jek7osfvfp.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 06:28:10PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com> writes:
>
> |> > How about posting before/after output of readelf -S -l, so we can
> |> > have a clue as to what is going on.
Note to Steve: -l not -I ! I was curious as to whether the segment
map changed. If it didn't then no matter.
> |> [ 4] .hash HASH 04000620 000620 0000a4 00 A 0 0 8
[snip]
> |> [ 4] .hash HASH 04000620 00061c 0000a4 04 A 2 0 8
>
> This seems to be the culprit.
sizeof_hash_entry == 4, so why does this matter?
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre