This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH/RFA] MIPS breakage with MDMX changes

From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej at wasabisystems dot com>
To: cgd at broadcom dot com
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 17:03:36 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] MIPS breakage with MDMX changes
Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc.
References: <20020606144431.G11012@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <yov5u1ogx8rk.fsf@broadcom.com>

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:55:11PM -0700, cgd@broadcom.com wrote:

 > i've been doing N builds (full GCC check runs, over the last few days)
 > using current gcc and current binutils (before Daniel put his patch
 > in) for mips-elf, mips64-elf, mipsisa32-elf ... and I never saw this
 > problem.
 > 
 > now i'm wondering why not!

Well, if your full build includes newlib, etc. then all your .o's are
going to have the same flags... but in my case, not all the .o's did
(e.g. /usr/lib/crt0.o, etc.).

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH/RFA] MIPS breakage with MDMX changes
  - From: cgd

References:
- [PATCH/RFA] MIPS breakage with MDMX changes
  - From: Jason R Thorpe
- Re: [PATCH/RFA] MIPS breakage with MDMX changes
  - From: cgd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]