This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: BFD relocations

From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
To: camm at enhanced dot com
Cc: drow at mvista dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gcl-devel at gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 14:41:51 -0700
Subject: Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: BFD relocations
References: <E17Eijt-0001Sw-00@intech19.enhanced.com> <20020603050518.GA18965@branoic.them.org> <54vg90uibg.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> <20020603222917.GA945@branoic.them.org> <54vg8ybuey.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com>
Reply-to: Geoff Keating <geoffk at redhat dot com>

> From: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>
> Date: 04 Jun 2002 17:33:57 -0400
> 
> Greetings. and thank you again for your reply!
> 
> In brief, I can relocate, but I get SIGILL on apparently correctly
> relocated code when trying to execute.
> 
> I would be very appreciative if you might save me the pain of
> searching through the kernel sources and brief me on what raises
> SIGILL on ppc.  I'm already aware of divide by zero, and of course an
> unknown opcode, but neither seems to be the case here.  Alignment?

Possibly a cache-flushing issue?

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> <geoffk@redhat.com>

References:
- BFD relocations
  - From: Camm Maguire
- Re: BFD relocations
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: BFD relocations
  - From: Camm Maguire
- Re: BFD relocations
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: BFD relocations
  - From: Camm Maguire

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]