This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Committed, SH: bfd bits for sh64 on sh-*, shl-* ELF targets. Fix opcodes too.
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- Cc: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>, Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Date: 13 Feb 2002 18:44:39 -0200
- Subject: Re: Committed, SH: bfd bits for sh64 on sh-*, shl-* ELF targets. Fix opcodes too.
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0202101531440.27283-100000@dair.pair.com>
On Feb 10, 2002, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> wrote:
> I think this should go on the 2.12 branch too or alternatively,
> Alexandre's opcodes patch should be reverted there. Either way
> would make sh-elf compile.
> opcodes:
> * configure.in <bfd_sh_arc>: For sh-* and shl-*, enable sh64
> support only for sh-*-*elf*, shl-*-*elf*, sh-*-linux* and
> shl-*-linux*.
> * configure: Regenerate.
> bfd:
> * config.bfd (sh-*-linux*, sh-*-elf* | sh-*-rtemself*): Add sh64
> vectors.
> (sh-*-netbsdelf*): New, to trump sh*-*-netbsdelf* and add sh64
> vectors.
I'm installing this in the branch, since it's broken right now. I
don't have a problem with reverting the patches later, but it clearly
can't stay the way it is for too long, and going forward is surely
going to be preferred for GDB. Dan, please let me know if you'd
rather have both patches reverted.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer