This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Fix some SSE2/x86_64 instruction patterns
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com,patches at x86-64 dot org
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:52:50 -0500
- Subject: Re: Fix some SSE2/x86_64 instruction patterns
- References: <20020125195907.GG17305@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020129053836.GB16187@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20020207140516.GI23785@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <ho7kpi7h70.fsf@gee.suse.de>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 06:17:39PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:
>
> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 08:59:07PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> >
> >> > * sse2.s (cvtps2dq, movdq2q, movq2dq): Correct operand types.
> >> > * i386.h:
> >> [snip]
> >> > (cvtps2dq, movdq2q, movq2dq): Correct operand ordering.
> >>
> >> According to the Intel manual, these were correct. Please triple
> >> check.
> > ! cvtps2dq %xmm0, %mm1
> > ! movdq2q %mm0, %xmm1
> > ! movq2dq %xmm0, %mm1
> >
> > Hmm, I see, the Intel manual claims the opposite.
> > Is the patch OK w/o these three chagnes? I will re-check what exactly
> > going on here.
>
> Is this also ok for the branch? Honza, please commit it also on the
> binutils-2_12 branch if it's ok.
Should be fine, thanks.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer