This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: stdbool.h problems

From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai at wxs dot nl>
To: kettenis at gnu dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 13:12:22 +0100
Subject: Re: stdbool.h problems
Organisation: Ninth Circle Enterprises
References: <20020207200437.19010.qmail@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20020207155640.B29183@nevyn.them.org>

-On [20020207 22:00], Daniel Jacobowitz (drow@mvista.com) wrote:
>Yes, I posted a patch to fix this today.  FreeBSD apparently has the
>same issue NetBSD has; even though that patch is coming out, I strongly
>recommend FreeBSD get fixed.  <stdbool.h> is a standard C99 header.

FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE and 4.4-STABLEs have stdbool.h, which I introduced
in 5.0-CURRENT some months ago.  Also,
http://people.freebsd.org/~mike/c99/ is where we track our C99
implementation status.

You do have to note that this is a production line of FreeBSD where do
are less keen on moving along the cutting edge.

I thought compilers and related things were meant to support the OS, and
not the other way around though?

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai / Kita no Mono / xMach coreteam
asmodai@[wxs.nl|xmach.org], finger asmodai@ninth-circle.org
http://www.softweyr.com/asmodai/
Honesty is the first chapter of the book of wisdom...

References:
- stdbool.h problems
  - From: kettenis
- Re: stdbool.h problems
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]