This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: More stdbool tweaking
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 05:52:03PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >I definitely agree that bfd.h should not include stdbool.h, and you
> >>should check in that change now to avoid the current broken snapshots.
> >
> >
> >Done. Unless Andrew objects vehemently to how I fixed them, I'll check
> >in the GDB fixes in an hour or two.
>
>
> If you've reverted your change, is there any immediate need to change
> GDB? Wasn't it all ``working'' before? I guess I need to re-read the
> thread. Anyway, I think BFD should be fixed before GDB 5.2 gets branched
> (I got the what wrong but I don't think I got the how or why).
I've reverted my change, mostly. But the point was that on my setup -
a recent ncurses installed makes the difference - GDB wasn't building
in the first place. Obviously I want GDB to build.
The current situation may be a little hackish, but the true/false code
always has been. I'm all in favor of coming up with a more thorough
fix, but I'd rather put something in place now than leave GDB not
building.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer