This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bad ELF header when mixing MIPS II with MIPS I

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
To: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts at csv dot ica dot uni-stuttgart dot de>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 31 Jan 2002 20:51:45 -0800
Subject: Re: Bad ELF header when mixing MIPS II with MIPS I
References: <20020131092536.A19466@lucon.org><1012508838.1399.4.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com><20020131123213.A22701@lucon.org><1012509235.1399.6.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com><20020131123655.B22759@lucon.org><20020131124951.M21777@dr-evil.shagadelic.org><1012536599.1398.14.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> <20020201044828.GB18499@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>


> He didn't get MIPS II but MIPS I.
> 

That explains why I thought he'd lost it. :)

> > Or was I mistaken in my reading?
> 
> BFD doesn't merge the EF_MIPS_ARCH header flag in a sane way.
> The ld result simply gets the ISA flag of the first object file
> given.
> 

Hrm. This ain't right. I'll ponder this.

-eric

-- 
I will not use abbrev.

References:
- Bad ELF header when mixing MIPS II with MIPS I
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Bad ELF header when mixing MIPS II with MIPS I
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: Bad ELF header when mixing MIPS II with MIPS I
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Bad ELF header when mixing MIPS II with MIPS I
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: Bad ELF header when mixing MIPS II with MIPS I
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Bad ELF header when mixing MIPS II with MIPS I
  - From: Jason R Thorpe
- Re: Bad ELF header when mixing MIPS II with MIPS I
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: Bad ELF header when mixing MIPS II with MIPS I
  - From: Thiemo Seufer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]