This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: binutils, why default stack size this low ?

From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
To: obry at ACT-Europe dot FR
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, danny_r_smith_2001 at yahoo dot co dot nz
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:22:50 -0500
Subject: Re: binutils, why default stack size this low ?
References: <20020116211914.7B6DA2264C@paris.ACT-Europe.FR>


Larger reserves limited the number of threads you could start.  The
MSVC compiler had a much smaller reserve than Cygwin before the patch.

References:
- binutils, why default stack size this low ?
  - From: Pascal Obry

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]