Re: [RFA:] test-case for relocs for linkonce-excluded sections don't become zero, causing g++ EH failure

[Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>]

> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 19:57:37 +0930
> From: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
> Cc: geoffk@redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com
> Mail-Followup-To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com>,
> 	geoffk@redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
> 
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 08:47:20AM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > 
> > In my most humble opinion, the linkonce-excluded-zero hack in
> > <URL:http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-06/msg00413.html>
> > and a binutils 2.11.3 with it is called for
> 
> I agree that something should be done.  It's probably worth applying
> Geoff's patch, or a variation, until someone finds a better fix.
> I'll take a look at it - we might be able to get rid of kept_section
> as that was something I added to struct section when writing this
> bit of code.

I would rather that people just spent their time on fixing gcc so that
it does the right thing.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>