This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [RFA:] test-case for relocs for linkonce-excluded sections don't become zero, causing g++ EH failure
> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 19:57:37 +0930
> From: Alan Modra <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
> Mail-Followup-To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <email@example.com>,
> firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 08:47:20AM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > In my most humble opinion, the linkonce-excluded-zero hack in
> > <URL:http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-06/msg00413.html>
> > and a binutils 2.11.3 with it is called for
> I agree that something should be done. It's probably worth applying
> Geoff's patch, or a variation, until someone finds a better fix.
> I'll take a look at it - we might be able to get rid of kept_section
> as that was something I added to struct section when writing this
> bit of code.
I would rather that people just spent their time on fixing gcc so that
it does the right thing.
- Geoffrey Keating <firstname.lastname@example.org>