This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: binutils + i18n
> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 00:38:21 +0200
> From: Jakub Jelinek <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 11:45:29PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> > > The issue would be more relevant if there were any translation files
> > > checked into the binutils sources, but, as far as I know, there are
> > > not.
> > I think it is only a matter of time until translators get to the
> > translation of the binutils catalogs.
> So I guess all of binutils should switch to safe-ctype.[ch]...
It depends. Some parts of binutils really should use is*(). For
instance, whether objdump -s decides whether to print a '.' or the real
character depends on the character set the user's using.
- Geoffrey Keating <email@example.com>