This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'

To: obrien at FreeBSD dot org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 20:30:09 -0400
CC: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20010709163642.A41697@dragon.nuxi.com> <200107092348.TAA00864@envy.delorie.com> <20010709170916.D41989@dragon.nuxi.com>


Ok, then.  Approved for head.  I don't recall the branch checkin
rules, but if I'm allowed to approve it, it's approved for that also.
Nick - can we add a "current branches and checkin rules" section on
the binutils web page?

> Nope.  I stayed consistent with the existing style of using basename().
> (especially since I'd like to also commit this to the 2.11 branch)
> 
> I'd rather commit my patch and leave trying lbasename() to a
> basename->lbasename sweep.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
  - From: Philip Blundell
- Re: [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
  - From: Nick Clifton

References:
- [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
  - From: David O'Brien
- Re: [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
  - From: David O'Brien

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]