This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: libiberty reports: "undefined reference to dlopen"
- To: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: libiberty reports: "undefined reference to dlopen"
- From: "Jeff W." <jeff at dark-techno dot org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 16:59:02 -0400 (EDT)
nevermind, I fixed it by uninstalling the binutils-dev from Debian and
reinstalling the .tar.gz files.
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Jeff W. wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, H . J . Lu wrote:
>
> > > cplus-dem.o(.text+0xae7): undefined reference to `dlopen'
> > > cplus-dem.o(.text+0xaf6): undefined reference to `dlerror'
> > > cplus-dem.o(.text+0xb1b): undefined reference to `dlsym'
> > > cplus-dem.o(.text+0xb2c): undefined reference to `dlerror'
> > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > >
> >
> > It looks like Debian uses a strange binutils. As far as I know,
> > those dlxxx functions are only used in my Linux binutils. But in
> > my Linux binutils, they shiuld be marked as weak undefined:
> >
> > # objdump --sym /usr/lib/libiberty.a | grep " dl"
> > 0000000000000000 w *UND* 0000000000000000 dlopen
> > 0000000000000000 w *UND* 0000000000000000 dlerror
> > 0000000000000000 w *UND* 0000000000000000 dlsym
> >
> > so that linker won't complain if they don't exist.
> >
> >
>
> I tried that, and I get the following:
>
> mnml:/usr/local/tau-2.9# objdump --sym /usr/lib/libiberty.a | grep " dl"
> 00000000 *UND* 00000000 dlopen
> 00000000 *UND* 00000000 dlerror
> 00000000 *UND* 00000000 dlsym
>
> Is there a way I can change it to how you've got yours set up? If not,
> how can I fix this problem? Like I said, I tried installing the .tar.gz
> version and still, same problems.
>
>
--
/---------------------------------\
Jeff W., jeff@dark-techno.org
ICQ# 17989474
"It's substance, not process"
http://dark-techno.org
http://logic-slave.org