This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: elflink.h -Bsymbolic change
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Subject: Re: elflink.h -Bsymbolic change
- From: Alan Modra <alan at linuxcare dot com dot au>
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 12:39:23 +1000 (EST)
- cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:31:35AM +1000, Alan Modra wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I don't think it is correct. Certainly, I shouldn't have forced
> > the protected symbols local, but on the other hand they do need to lose
> > their .plt entry, don't they? Otherwise they won't be "protected" from
> > the dynamic linker binding against some other symbol. See attached patch
>
> No, it is the job for the dynamic linker. I don't think you should
> change PLT for protected.
H.J., before my 2001-04-04 change went in, protected symbols would have
lost their .plt entry. Are you saying this is wrong?
--
Alan Modra