This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Reloc BUG in as


"Mark E." <snowball3@bigfoot.com> writes:

> > Your coff-i386 result might well be correct, depending upon how the
> > linker handles the reloc.  After the final link you should see a call
> > to the absolute address 0.  If you see anything else, then something
> > went wrong somewhere.
> 
> I changed the example to put the call into section "foo" so I could easily 
> find it. Here's the result:
> 
> Disassembly of section foo:
> 
> 0000ce00 <a>:
>     ce00:	e8 fb 31 ff ff       	call   0 <start-0x10d0>
>     ce05:	00 00                	add    %al,(%eax)
> 
> Looks good to me. Perhaps the solution isn't in generic code then?

Perhaps.  I'm going to be pedantic, though, and point out that the
original e-mail had two test cases.  One worked.  The other didn't.
In your first e-mail, you were discussing the test case which worked,
not the one which failed.  Did you try both test cases?

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]