This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: A patch for elf32.em (Re: GNU/Linux vs. libtool --no-undefined)


On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:54:28PM -0800, Geoff Keating wrote:
> > I don't know how useful it will be. I agree with Ian that it doesn't
> > make much sense to warn about the undefined symbols in the DSOs you
> > are linking against when you are building a DSO. It is very possible
> > that those undefined symbols may change/disappear/be different from
> > the runtime version.
> 
> I would expect that the common case is that the version you are
> linking against, and the version you are running with, will be the
> same.

What makes you think of that? I will bet my /lib/libc.so.6 has
different content than yours on our Linux/ia32 machines. But why
do you care as long as they follow the same ABI version? The
undefined symbols in the DSO are not the part of the ABI.


-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]