This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Your patch on 2001-01-26 is bad

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: Your patch on 2001-01-26 is bad
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 06 Feb 2001 23:59:45 -0800
Cc: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20010206203822.A10129@valinux.com><20010206212624.A23675@redhat.com><m3g0hrrpyf.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com><20010206234233.A23835@redhat.com>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> I don't particularly care about ld.so profiling.  If you want to do
> that, you can't be using visibility at all.

The way explained is how these visibilities are defined.  Whether you
like it or not.  These definitions are useful and other optimizations
can be implemented with other means.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Your patch on 2001-01-26 is bad
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Your patch on 2001-01-26 is bad
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Your patch on 2001-01-26 is bad
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Your patch on 2001-01-26 is bad
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Your patch on 2001-01-26 is bad
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]