This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: Handle java_demangling?
- To: "'H . J . Lu'" <hjl at valinux dot com>,<binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: RE: Handle java_demangling?
- From: "Kenneth Block" <block at zk3 dot dec dot com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:11:32 -0500
- Cc: <kenneth dot block at compaq dot com>
- Reply-To: <block at zk3 dot dec dot com>
Yes.
-----Original Message-----
From: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
[mailto:binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of H . J . Lu
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 3:45 PM
To: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
Cc: kenneth.block@compaq.com
Subject: Handle java_demangling?
Shouldn't java_demangling be handled since we support it now?
--
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)
---
2000-11-16 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org>
* cplus-dem.c (main): Handle java_demangling.
--- cplus-dem.c Thu Nov 16 11:32:15 2000
+++ cplus-dem.c Thu Nov 16 12:41:21 2000
@@ -5092,6 +5092,7 @@ main (argc, argv)
case gnu_demangling:
case lucid_demangling:
case arm_demangling:
+ case java_demangling:
case edg_demangling:
valid_symbols = standard_symbol_characters ();
break;