This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: A patch for ltmain.sh
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>
- Subject: Re: A patch for ltmain.sh
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 10 Oct 2000 03:44:48 -0200
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <20001008110242.A21728@valinux.com>
On Oct 8, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> wrote:
> I think we can ignore the messages from relink. If there is a real
> problem, we will see in the normal link. I can image the messages from
> relink may be useful for libtool developers. But I certainly don't
> want to see them in "make check". Here is a patch.
It's actually supposed to be useful for libtool users, in case the
wrapper script fails to relink the executable for no apparent reason.
I'd rather see the output redirected to a temporary file and displayed
along with the relink command in case it fails, and discarded
otherwise.
In any case, ltmain.sh is a generated file. It's ltmain.in you want
to change, and patches should go to libtool-patches@gnu.org. Thanks!
(Which doesn't mean I'm discarding your patch; I'll keep it handy and
check in it in my next slot of time devoted to libtool, unless you've
come up with something along the lines I suggest above :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me