This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ pr
- To: "Alexander N. Kabaev" <ak03 at gte dot com>
- Subject: Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ pr
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 12:36:05 -0700
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,David O'Brien <obrien at NUXI dot com>
- References: <20000905112834.A16141@lucon.org> <XFMail.000905153104.ak03@gte.com>
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:31:04PM -0400, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
>
> > I can only speak for myself. I don't have the
> > time to spend on the release branch.
>
> In other words, you officially abandon your users immediately after release has
> been cut off.
>
That is simply not true :-). We just have different views on things.
Most of Linux developers know where to find a current, stable binutils.
H.J.