This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Advice needed on when to synthesize <sym>.high_bound in ld


For bounded pointers (see http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/bp/main.html),
gcc will emit symbol references named `foo.high_bound', if it doesn't
have enough information to determine the size of `foo' at the time
its address is taken.  This happens often for extern arrays and
incomplete struct types.

At link time, I wish to synthesize definitions for symbols with a
`.high_bound' suffix.  For ELF (and that's all I care about), this is
easy since all data & common symbol table entries have sizes.

What's the best time to do this?should I make a separate pass prior to
ldwrite looking for undefined .high_bound symbols and create
definitions for them.

Should I test for the `.high_bound'
suffix and lookup the base symbol name at the time an undefined
is normally detected, or 

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]