This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
- To: wilson at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:12:39 -0700
- CC: jason at redhat dot com, hjl at lucon dot org, aoliva at cygnus dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, angela at cygnus dot com
- References: <200007212205.PAA21567@wilson.cygnus.com>
> cc: jason@redhat.com, hjl@lucon.org, aoliva@cygnus.com,
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com,
> angela@cygnus.com
> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:05:49 -0700
> From: Jim Wilson <wilson@cygnus.com>
>
> I wouldn't try to do much work in this area for a bit. Red Hat is
> working on some major changes to how hostXhost toolchains work.
>
> Presumably this is the stuff that Brendan Kehoe started? He did post a patch
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-01/msg00641.html
> but the current stuff might be a bit different as that was 6 months ago.
> It would be useful to know if this mechanism works for H.J. as he has his
> own contraints that are rather different from ours.
It's quite a bit changed from Brendan's work. I don't know what HJ's
constraints are, so I don't know if it will suit HJ. If I was trying
to develop a single-tree cross environment, I wouldn't do it the way
HJ seems to be doing it. Perhaps HJ can explain more?
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>