This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: support for picoJava
- To: Steve Chamberlain <sac@transmeta.com>
- Subject: Re: support for picoJava
- From: jtc@redback.com (J.T. Conklin)
- Date: 02 Sep 1999 21:45:02 -0700
- Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
- References: <199909030401.VAA04248@dilithium.transmeta.com>
- Reply-To: jtc@redback.com
>>>>> "sac" == Steve Chamberlain <sac@transmeta.com> writes:
sac> --- ../original-binutils/config.sub Wed Sep 1 13:49:01 1999
sac> +++ config.sub Thu Sep 2 16:52:08 1999
sac> @@ -619,6 +619,10 @@
sac> pentiumii-* | pentium2-*)
sac> basic_machine=i786-`echo $basic_machine | sed 's/^[^-]*-//'`
sac> ;;
sac> + pjl*) basic_machine=pjl-transmeta
sac> + ;;
sac> + pj*) basic_machine=pj-transmeta
sac> + ;;
sac> pn)
sac> basic_machine=pn-gould
sac> ;;
Is the intent for the target config triple to be pj-transmeta-elf? I
was under the impression that PicoJava was an embedded processor/core
that could be licenced from Sun. As such, wouldn't it be more correct
to use pj-unknown-elf like most of the other embedded configurations?
--jtc
--
J.T. Conklin
RedBack Networks